Watching her second congressional hearing. They keep talking about her as if she's black. Is Lurita Doan black?
Also, what does that have to do with anything?
Also, what the hell is Dan Burton talking about? He's going on about the Clintons, about Al Gore's fundraiser at a Buddhist temple, and over and over about Sandy Berger's socks. Wasn't that story debunked a long time ago?
Now, in defense of Doan, he just said "at least she's here testifying." Isn't that because she was SUBPOENAED? And the very next thing he says is that "She's not saying she forgot everything." But that is exactly what she just did!
And now back to Clinton... Boy, my memory is terrible. Clinton must have been a really sucky president.
UPDATE: You know, I don't actually know if she was subpoenaed. I'll try and find out. I thought she was, but I could be wrong.
UPDATE II: This hearing is ridiculous. It seems to me the questions that should be asked are simple. Namely: Is the GSA prohibited by the Hatch Act from holding meetings for political purposes, and urging non-political government employees to act for political purposes? Was such a meeting held while you led the GSA? Are you not ultimately responsible for this occurance? Does this not mean that you violated the Hatch Act?
After all that, aren't we done?
UPDATE III: Lurita Doan, is in fact, black. Though I fail to grasp what that could possibly have to do with anything. Now everyone is arguing about who brought up the black thing first. Classy.

You're boring and a little gay.
Posted by: Dino | June 13, 2007 at 02:32 PM
Just a little?
Posted by: Bell | June 13, 2007 at 03:04 PM